Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sullivan" Results 61 - 80 of 1,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But few people ever attempt to convert such decisions into a common currency. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Observing that “[m]edical certification” of disability had “become one of the major paths to public aid in the modern welfare state,” Stone wondered whether policymakers were asking the “concept of disability” to do too much and whether they were sufficiently alert to the concept’s tendency to expand over time.Filed in 1983 and decided by the Supreme Court in 1990, Sullivan v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:35 am by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Recent years have seen an uptick in people worried that the standard set for defamation in New York Times v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am by David Cole
In our democracy, Madison argued, “[t]he people, not the government, possess the absolute sovereignty,” and the people must be free to criticize those who govern them. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Nor does the consumer’s lack of understanding have to be reasonable, and there is no required threshold number of people who lacked understanding.[24] Further, a consumer may have a lack of understanding even if he or she is generally aware that a particular consequence may follow—e.g., he or she may be aware of the consequence, but may not understand either the magnitude or likelihood of a particular risk.[25] Evidence of lack of understanding can include direct evidence,… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
 Sullivan and from the Seventh Circuit's precedent in Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
This sounds remarkably like the “actual malice” standard of Times v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But it should be fairly reliable, and should thus diminish the damage that the AI program may do to people's reputations. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by INFORRM
The Ongoing Campaign to Misinform the American Public Regarding the Integrity of the 2020 Election and the January 6 Attack While there is debate among legal experts regarding whether the internal communications between Fox News employees disclosed in the Dominion case are sufficient to establish the ‘actual malice’ standard in NY Times v Sullivan, this evidence provides a damning picture of the extent to which the network is unconcerned with performing its First… [read post]