Search for: "The Tri-State Consumer, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
I feel in a somewhat unique position to write this since my superior at the New Jersey State Department of Health, Oscar J. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
First, it says a federal court can apply a state anti-SLAPP law, although state anti-SLAPP laws don’t apply to federal claims (in this case, the RICO claim). [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 3:35 pm
In this version, she proposed to add Assurant, Inc., ASI's parent company, as a defendant. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:43 pm
There's no way in logic or law that dilatory plaintiffs suing over this device should be entitled to over five years of tolling based upon meritless allegations of a supposed nation-wide class based upon extraterritorial application (questionable in and of itself) of one state's consumer fraud statute. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:19 am
Edriver, Inc., which did find false advertising based on use of dmv.org based on consumer confusion about whether the website was owned by or affiliated with state governments. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:05 am
” The case cite is eNom, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 5:54 pm
See also The State Bar of California "News Release". [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:28 am
The Ticketreserve Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:26 pm
By Eric Goldman FragranceNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:30 am
HIP, Inc., v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Applied Consumer & Clinical Evaluations Inc., 2016 ONCA 520 [115] With respect, however, I am of the view that in assessing the quantum of punitive damages the motion judge fell into legal error in two respects. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:42 am
If a consumer tried a non-matching car and decided to buy it, the deception would have dissipated. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
When Apple tried to extend its protection internationally, the DPMA refused and said, in essence, that consumers would not regard the sign as a trade mark in sense of indicating trade origin: the depiction of the space devoted to the sale of the undertaking’s goods was nothing other than the representation of an essential aspect of that undertaking’s business. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
Finally, Diamond tried to get the court to adopt the rule of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
Warnaco Swimwear, Inc., 709 F. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 6:17 pm
” The Court also distinguished the case from its 2006 decision in Tri-G, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
" See In re Pitney Bowes, Inc., 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1417, 1420 (T.T.A.B. 2018); In re DSM Pharms., Inc., 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1623, 1626 (T.T.A.B. 2008). [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm
Typically, the issues in the case are narrowed during the litigation process, with only some claims actually being tried. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
In other words, consumers purportedly ask Amazon if it carries MTM watches, and instead of saying no, Amazon allegedly tries to “switch” the consumers to rival offerings. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
EForce Media, Inc., 2007 WL 3355369 (W.D.N.C. [read post]
