Search for: "Thom Lambert"
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 9:08 pm
Bad idea [Mark Calabria/Cato, The Economist, Thom Lambert] NYT, Reuters misreport effect of Stand Your Ground laws [Jacob Sullum, Robert VerBruggen/NRO, earlier here, etc.] [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 9:15 am
Confirmed participants thus far (with a number of pending invites) include: Dennis Carlton (Chicago GSB) Dan Crane (Michigan Law) Herbert Hovenkamp (Iowa) Einer Elhauge (Harvard) Luke Froeb (Vanderbilt) Andrew Gavil (Howard) Thom Lambert (Missouri) Geoff Manne (LECG) Steve Salop (Georgetown) Joseph Simons (Paul Weiss) Danny Sokol (Florida) Josh Wright (George Mason) Paul Yde (Freshfields) [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:14 am
[Report; website] Thom Lambert is skeptical of the American Antitrust Institute's jury instruction project, given that institution's poor track record in favoring plaintiffs' lawyers over consumers. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:40 pm
Only service dogs are permitted in spaces that serve food or drink of any kind.As Thom Lambert points out, this is a ridiculous regulation. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:13 pm
Herbert Hovenkamp, Herbert Hovenkamp on Revising the Merger Guidelines Thom Lambert, “Standardizing” The Horizontal Merger Guidelines Geoffrey Manne, Fix the Supply Side Danny Sokol, Small Changes Joseph Simons, Revisions to the Merger Guidelines: Above All, Do No Harm [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Boudreaux for the Wall Street Journal Learning to Love Insider Trading by Thom Lambert for Truth on The Market Insider Trading Laws and Conventional Wisdom by Vellum Galleon Insider Trading Case: ‘Like Finding a Needle in a Haystack' by Michael Corkery for the Deal Journal Insider Trading: A Primer by Gary N. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:48 am
The lineup includes: Dennis Carlton (Chicago GSB) Dan Crane (Michigan Law) Robert Gertner (Chicago GSB) Herbert Hovenkamp (Iowa) Einer Elhauge (Harvard) Joe Farrell (Federal Trade Commission) Luke Froeb (Vanderbilt) Andrew Gavil (Howard) Thom Lambert (Missouri) Geoff Manne (LECG) Steve Salop (Georgetown) J. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:52 pm
Participants: Alden Abbott, Associate Director, Bureau of Competition, FTC Tim Brennan, University of Maryland Dan Crane, Cardozo Law School (soon to be University of Michigan Law School) David Evans, LECG and University College London and University of Chicago Law School Herbert Hovenkamp, University of Iowa Law School Keith Hylton, Boston University School of Law Bruce Kobayashi, George Mason Law School William Kolasky, WilmerHale and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ … [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Finally, DOJ says that Google has an insurmountable data advantage (see Thom Lambert on that argument here), but that’s not obviously true, and there are reasons to doubt it, absent the sort of rigorous demonstration that we’ve yet to see. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:12 pm
Thom Lambert recently discussed it: A hallmark of Austrian thinking, especially as articulated by F.A. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:19 am
Thom Lambert Although I didn’t know him as well as some of my co-bloggers did, Larry very much influenced my own development as an academic. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:46 pm
As Lambert J.A. says in Robertson at 388: …But the remarks made in the course of the reasons in Hawitt v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:28 am
Thom Lambert and Jonathan Barnett both have interesting posts on the matter. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:12 am
Rather than recapitulate the whole thing, I’ll point readers to Alden Abbott’s ToTM discussion earlier this week, another by Thom Lambert. an amicus brief by my International Center for Law & Economics colleagues Geoff Manne and Gus Hurwitz (plus a number of other law & economics scholars), and a thorough critique of the FTC’s case by Bruce Kobayashi (former director of the FTC’s Bureau of Economics) and Tim Muris (former FTC chairman). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:02 pm
UPDATE: Former Obama Student Thom Lambert: My Professor, My Judge, and the Doctrine of Judicial Review. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:56 pm
Thom Lambert at the excellent blog, Truth on the Market, seems to agree. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:44 pm
Professor Thom Lambert likewise opines that: But to say that current insider trading rules generally don’t reach trades by members of Congress is not to imply that congressional staffers are free to trade on material non-public information they acquire in the course of their jobs. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 7:37 am
Decisions to initiate a rulemaking should be viewed through a cost-benefit lens (See summaries of Thom Lambert’s masterful treatment of regulation, of which rulemaking is a subset, here and here). [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:59 am
” Along similar lines, Thom Lambert observed that: Even if a covered platform could establish that a challenged practice would maintain or substantially enhance the platform’s core functionality, it would also have to prove that the conduct was “narrowly tailored” and “reasonably necessary” to achieve the desired end, and, for many behaviors, the “le[ast] discriminatory means” of doing so. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
In the headline to a Dec. 7 press release, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it, in concert with the U.S. [read post]
