Search for: "Thomas C. Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
 Under Bill C-18, news content is made available if a platform reproduces news content or facilitates access to news content in any way. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
DrakeThe Movement: The African American Struggle for Civil Rights by Thomas C. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
Sponsor: Michael Burgess (R-TX) Cosponsors (38 Republicans): Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) Andre Carson (D-IN) Mike Quigley (D-IL) Andy Harris (R-MD) David McKinley (R-WV) Bill Johnson (R-OH) Steve Cohen (D-TN) Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) William Timmons (R-SC) Chris Pappas (D-NH) Fred Upton (R-MI) Mo Brooks (R-AL) Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) Eric Swalwell (D-CA) Ann Kuster (D-NH) Earl “Buddy” Carter (R-GA) Mike Johnson (R-LA) Gregory Steube (R-FL) Jim Costa (D-CA)… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Held, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of are that Mr Sivananthan misled or misinformed Boris Johnson, then campaigning for election as Prime Minister, causing Mr Johnson to refer in his letter to ‘deepening ties’ with Sri Lanka. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Events The Bonavero Institute, University of Oxford, is hosting an online lecture by Vicki C Jackson titled Knowledge Institutions in Constitutional Democracies: Reflections on “the Press” on 22 March 2022, 15:00-16:30. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled a class-action lawsuit against TikTok concerning children’s privacy violations can proceed, SMO v TikTok Inc. and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:06 pm by Josh Blackman
Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835) and Justice Thurgood Marshall (1967-1991) Justice John Rutledge (1790-1791) and Justice Wiley Rutledge (1943-1949) Justice Thomas Johnson (1792-1793) and Justice William Johnson (1804-1834) Justice Samuel Chase (1796-1811) and Chief Justice Salmon Chase (1864-1873) Justice John Marshall Harlan I (1877-1911) and Justice John Marshall Harlan II (1955-1971) Justice Lucius Quint C. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
At that time, four justices – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – noted that they concurred in the decision to deny review because the factual record was too undeveloped to grant preliminary relief to the coach, emphasizing that they did not “necessarily agree with the decision (much less the opinion) below. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
The court concluded that, even if ABC did discriminate based on race (which ABC had denied, id. at 996), it had a right to do so: [C]asting decisions are a necessary component of any entertainment show's creative content. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 8:19 am by Bridget Crawford
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching     Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law   Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore       Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Wes Henricksen Henricksen Barry Torts Health Law Environmental Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont       Steven M. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 24 – Remedies: Thomas F. [read post]