Search for: "Thomas v City of New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that they did not owe a special duty of care to the plaintiff (see Koyko v City of New York, 189 AD3d at 812; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d at 698). [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
An ambiguity as to the finality of an administrative determination tolls the running of the statute of limitationsMatter of Hasberry v New York City Dept. of Educ., et. al. and the New York City Department of Education, et. al., 61 AD3d 523Marco Viola and Linda Branch, employed by Thomas Buses, Inc., filed applications with the New York City Department of Education [DOE] to become certified bus… [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
Going forward, Thomas explained, courts should uphold gun restrictions only if there is a tradition of such regulation in U.S. history The state law at the heart of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:41 am
New York City Transit Authority, the First Department revisited an issue we reported on in January, adding an express call “for resolution by the Court of Appeals. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
City of New York, New York, a challenge to New York City’s limits on transporting personal firearms, by groups of senators and representatives, including several Democratic presidential candidates. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:18 pm
In my new book on Kelo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am
Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
He also admitted to using cocaine on several occasions while employed as a Firefighter by the Department in the course of the disciplinary hearing.Citing Murolo v Safir, 246 AD2d 653, the Appellate Division found that the determination that Kelly knowingly ingested cocaine "while employed by the Fire Department of the City of New York is supported by substantial evidence and therefore may not be set aside. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:51 pm
Halleck, SCOTUS held that the private non-profit corporation designated by New York City to manage state-required public-access cable channels was not a state actor, so not subject to First Amendment limitations in banning a speaker from the channels. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:34 am
New York City Dept. of Educ., Judge Peter H. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
He also thanked the New York OCDETF Crime Strike Force, the Rockland County Sheriffs Department, the Rockland County Intelligence Center, the New York City Police Department, the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
He also thanked the New York OCDETF Crime Strike Force, the Rockland County Sheriffs Department, the Rockland County Intelligence Center, the New York City Police Department, the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:18 am
City of New York. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
Today the justices granted review in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
(See prior posting.)Meanwhile Reuters reported yesterday:Humorous ads for a documentary film that aims to promote understanding and tolerance of Muslims went up in New York subways on Monday after the movie's production company won a legal battle with the city's transit authority....The advertisements debuted after a federal court in Manhattan ruled in October that being Muslim was a religious, not a political, identity. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:02 am
Court of Appeals in New York City has held (Steiner v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:22 pm
When the Supreme Court struck down New York’s prior concealed-carry law two years ago in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
