Search for: "Thomas v. Consumers Power Co" Results 61 - 80 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
California and Justice Clarence Thomas’ more cabined understanding in his concurrence in American Legion v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Imminently, in the thickening avalanche of cases triggered by a White House heedless of internal check and contemptuous of both, supposedly co-equal branches, Roberts and his colleagues will be forced to interpret the Court’s role in enforcing constitutional constraints on presidential power till now rarely or ever contested.We have not seen this movie before, but we have seen on [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
   The latest iteration of the Restatement of the Law of Consumer Contracts (draft) aspires to summarize majority common-law rules and trends based on “all” relevant cases in a particular area of (consumer) law.Link to -- > Tentative Draft dated April 18, 2019 But what is a relevant case? [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am by MOTP
How could the consumer prove the opposite, - non-exercise of the option to accelerate by the creditor? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
At least five Ohio courts have already issued similar speech-restrictive injunctions in other cases, including cases involving political and consumer disputes. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
It is easy to underestimate the lobbying power (and financial resources) of the big tech companies, but as the year went on the content side began to adapt their arguments and win over politicians, consumers and regulators - but it's all far far from over and we expect 2019 to be just as exciting. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Those decisions—including one by then-Judge Clarence Thomas—were by judges who are as skeptical of antitrust as Judge Kavanaugh does, and they grossly exaggerated the actual holdings and language of the Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Justice Clarence Thomas concurred to write that he should have joined the Quill dissent in 1992. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am by Aaron Nielson
When I teach the political question doctrine, I assign the en banc decision in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
The Court’s Rejection of the Physical Presence Rule in Quill Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court; writing for a majority that included Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, and Gorsuch.[8]  Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. [read post]