Search for: "Thomas v. Cornell" Results 61 - 80 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In June 1969, the Supreme Court announced the modern test that governs when the government may punish speech as incitement in Brandenburg v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
 The extraordinary  Ngoc Son Bui (my interview with him here) has organized a very interesting workshop (Constitutional Law of Greater China, 9-10 December 2021, Oxford Programme in Asian Laws) around essays that will be contributed to a Handbook of Constitutional Law in Greater China that is likely to become a standard in the field and an important reference for anyone interested in issues of Chinese constitutionalism (Program here). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
” Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Nassif v Seven Network [2021] FCA 1286. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in 2009 the Justices heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Kearney, Marquette Law, and Thomas W. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:03 am by admin
Before the case was argued in the fall, Cornell Law students Thomas Shannon, Andrew Kingsbury, and Tyler Schmitt did an excellent job previewing the case for our Bulletin subscribers here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-956 You can listen to the oral argument and read a brief summary of the decision over at the Oyez Project here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/18-956 And, of course, we have the entire opinion on our site… [read post]