Search for: "Thomas v. State of Louisiana*" Results 61 - 80 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Historian Thomas Aiello describes the origins of the statute in Bourbon Louisiana—a period when white Democrats sought to redeem their state after Reconstruction—its survival through the civil rights era of the 1950s and 1960s, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm
The decision drew a dissent from three conservative justices, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito, who suggested that the court was ducking the cases because they involved Planned Parenthood and touched on abortion. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by David Cohen - Guest
  The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Thomas agreed on the result, though argued that the unanimous jury trial guarantee of the Sixth Amendment majority should be seen as applied to the states via the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, not the Due Process Clause (his view as to the Bill of Rights more generally). [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
A esos efectos, la Ley de Relaciones Federales – que sustituyó a la ley Foraker que excluía el derecho a juicio por jurado en Puerto Rico – estableció la expresión congresional de la extensión de la doctrina de incorporación selectiva al territorio boricua: The rights, privileges, and inmunities of citizens of the United States shall be respected in Puerto Rico to the same extent as though Puerto Rico were a State of the Union… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
The justices returned the cases of several Arizona inmates to the state courts, instructing those courts to take another look at the cases in light of last term’s decision in Montgomery v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
United States, 523 U.S. 614, 620-21 (1998) Modifica los elementos de la conducta delictiva por los que una persona fue convicto. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
  In 1972, the Supreme Court in Apodaca v. [read post]