Search for: "Tong v. Tong*"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2020, 7:44 pm
United States and McDonald v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:58 pm
Tong, 2010 BCSC 111 at paras. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 8:00 pm
., V.7., N.3 (2023). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
R. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
, Colorado Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2020, Emmanuel Pernot-Leplay, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) – KoGuan Law School. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
, Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, Emmanuel Pernot-Leplay, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) – KoGuan Law School. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
In Abrams v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Tugendhat J heard the adjournedCMC in Kim & anr v Tong & ors (part heard from 7 October 2011) and gave ex tempore rulings. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:02 pm
Tong v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
Birth Injuries v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm
In Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew ([1990] 2 M.L.J. 65) the Singapore Court of Appeal made it clear that the right to free speech was subject, inter alia, to the common law of defamation as modified by the Defamation Act: “An absolute or unrestricted right of free speech would result in persons recklessly maligning others with impunity and the exercise of such a right would do the public more harm than good. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
