Search for: "Tonja"
Results 61 - 80
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am
Hasen references a forthcoming article by Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyzing 55 years of oral arguments and concluding that today the “justices are behaving like advocates,” not jurists. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” More oral-argument analysis comes from Tonja Jacobi at SCOTUS OA, who presents recent research showing that “interruptions between two justices at oral argument are significantly associated with voting disagreement between pair in the eventual case outcome. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag explain that “[i]f you wanted to know which way Justice Gorsuch was going to vote in the 2017 Term, you could have placed your bets with 86% accuracy by observing just one statistic from oral argument—how many times Gorsuch interrupted each side. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag agree with this prediction, noting that their “empirical analysis of the Preap oral argument suggests that Kavanaugh will be loyal to the Republicans”; they go on to observe that “[c]onsidering all four cases the Court heard in Kavanaugh’s first week on the Bench, the newest justice may not be ideologically moderate, but so far he has been moderate in his behavior, in some senses. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
” Briefly: At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag “predict a unique alliance” based on last week’s oral argument in Gundy v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:08 pm
As First Monday approaches, SCOTUS watchers would do well to follow SCOTUS OA, a blog launched in August by Tonja Jacobi of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law and Matthew Sag of Loyola University Chicago School of Law. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:36 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag parse polite and formal language in Supreme Court oral arguments. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:09 pm
Tonja Jacobi (Northwestern) and Matt Sag (Loyola Chicago) have launched a new blog/website devoted to rigorous empirical analysis of supreme court oral arguments, including review analysis and forecasts. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 8:15 pm
“The Gender Effect, Writ Small”: Tonja Jacobi has this post at her “SCOTUS OA” blog. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:20 am
“Gendered interruptions at the Court”: Tonja Jacobi has this post at her brand-new “SCOTUS OA” blog, which may eventually provide another data point for my thesis that every blog with “SCOTUS” in its title that exists for sufficient time will eventually become part of the “SCOTUSblog” empire. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:29 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi analyzes interruptions during oral arguments last term, concluding that “[t]he 2017 Term was in fact the second most gender unbalanced in the last 20 years”; a follow-up post by Jacobi and Matthew Sag explains the methodology used in this analysis. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 2:00 am
Northwestern University Pritzker School of LawTonja Jacobi, Professor of Law, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, presents today as part of the Summer Faculty Workshop series. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:25 am
Tonja Jacobi and Ross Berlin (Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law and Minnesota Court of Appeals #315B) have posted Supreme Irrelevance: The Court's Abdication in Criminal Procedure Jurisprudence (UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2018) on SSRN.... [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 12:02 pm
28 Jun 2018, 6:06 pm
” She pointed out that an important 2017 Virginia Law Review article by Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers has had a significant impact on how Chief Justice Roberts conducts oral argument (the article is “Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments” available on SSRN here). [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 3:07 pm
Asked about a study by Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers finding that the female justices are disproportionately interrupted by their male colleagues and by male advocates, Sotomayor responded, to applause, “Is there a woman in the room who’s ever failed to notice that? [read post]
5 May 2018, 1:03 pm
But when Tonja B. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm
Tonja Jacobi and Prof. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 9:31 am
Tonja L. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
And, of course, an eminent group of doctrinal scholars, including Brandon Garrett, Eve Primus, Randy Hertz, Marty Guggenheim, Tonja Jacobi, Lee Kovarsky, Yale Kamisar, and many others submitted an amicus brief explaining the history, development, and application of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment voluntariness doctrine. [read post]
