Search for: "Tooke v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 61 - 80 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
 US District Judge William Orrick ruled that the monkey, who borrowed British photographer David Slater's camera and took the selfies, cannot own the copyright in the pictures. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am by INFORRM
One took place last week before Warby J over four days, Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Investigatory Powers Tribunal handed down judgment on compensation in the case of News Group Newspapers v Commissioner of Police ([2016] UKIPTrib 14_176-H). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If the name rings a bell, you’re right: Dan Alban of the IJ successfully took on the Internal Revenue Service – and won – in the fight against regulating tax preparers in Loving et al v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm by Mark Ashton
 The statute was and remains Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm by Mark Ashton
 The statute was and remains Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
No international power can be responsible for this. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue, Judge Hardiman’s opinion for the Court held that prior to 2004, taxpayers could establish “bona fide residence” regardless of whether their intent was to avoid tax liability or not. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
One day, she received a notice from the Internal Revenue Service advising her that she owed taxes. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
To decide this question, the Supreme Court, in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Thus, American trade policy was founded constitutionally on the collection of revenues from imports, and U.S. laws into the 1930s promoted the collection of revenues and severe limitations on imports, infamously in the Tariff Act of 1930, known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, that many historians consider to have been a significant contributor to global Depression. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
Thus, American trade policy was founded constitutionally on the collection of revenues from imports, and U.S. laws into the 1930s promoted the collection of revenues and severe limitations on imports, infamously in the Tariff Act of 1930, known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, that many historians consider to have been a significant contributor to global Depression. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
Instead of reinvigorating antitrust enforcement, the Government took the opposite tack. [read post]