Search for: "Town v. Land Use Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2019, 6:15 pm
Concerning the equal protection claim, the court again emphasized the local nature of land use decisions. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:51 pm
Beard v Town of Monroe, 2015 WL 8023632 (D. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
The Board went even further, requiring that this open space be offered to the town’s conservation commission or to a land trust, in either case with a restriction that the space be used - in perpetuity - for passive recreation with public access. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:17 am
The Commission found potential claims regarding the right to equality and freedom from racial discrimination (Article II) and the right to protection of the law for one's private and family life (Article V). [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
The District Court (Edgardo Ramos, Judge) ruled that Sherman’s claim under the Takings Clause was not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) Kialegee Tribal Town v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:36 am
Meriwether, Factors and Drayage, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
(Business Leasing; Tribal Trust Land) Lamkin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
In 1997, the Trust asked the Town’s Conservation Commission (the “Commission”) whether the Wetlands Protection Act applied to the Property, to which the Commission responded that it did not. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 7:44 pm
International Investors v Town Plan and Zoning Commission of the Town of Fairfield, 2021 WL 502235 (CT App. 2/16/2021) [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:33 pm
Up State Tower Co., LLC v Town of Kiatone, 2019 WL 6320335 (WDNY 11/26/2019) [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:31 am
Concluding that there would be negligible direct and cumulative effects on aesthetics, biological resources and land use and planning, staff recommended acceptance of a negative declaration. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:33 pm
But there are also several legal points that the majority does not address.In Brenwick Associates LLC and Town of Whitestown, Indiana v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
Town of Ledyard (taxation of slot machines)Missouri v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
HPC §, Article XV, §108-44 entitled "Continuing existing uses" states that: except as otherwise provided in the Article, the lawfully permitted use of land or buildings existing at the time of the adoption of the chapter may be continued, although such use does not conform to the standards specified by the chapter for the zone in which such land or building is located; said uses are deemed nonconforming uses. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
For example, in Town Of Flower Mound v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 2:35 am
Sooner than I would have thought when I publshed the latest Epic Games v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm
Lastly, non hearsay allegations must establish, if true, every element of the offense charged and the defendant's commission thereof as ruled in People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Determining whether to use the Town’s limited resources to alter its roadways goes to the heart of this doctrine. [read post]
