Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
  So if the Court of Appeal is really making the somewhat revolutionary holding that therapists who are seeing patients but not "treating" them are no longer subject to Tarasoff, it needs to clearly say so, and also needs a lot more support for that result than the one-sentence distinction it offers here. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:08 am by Paul E. Freehling
But when his former employer asked a Providence, Rhode Island Superior Court judge to enter an injunction, he refused to prevent patients from being treated by a doctor of their own choosing. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:06 pm
On March 16, 2009 Lambda filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Superior Court in Hartford, Connecticut, in the case of Luis Patino v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Friday, July 18, 2014 Alaska Supreme Court affirms full faith and credit to tribal court orders in Simmonds v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:15 am by Hull and Hull LLP
The Ontario Superior Court recently considered the application of the principle of proprietary estoppel in an estate dispute in its decision in Cowderoy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:16 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Pioneer Electronics v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Phillip Obbard is a research attorney for the Superior Court in Alameda County. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:54 pm by Adam.Doherty
  Earlier this year, Judge Kern of the Middlesex Superior Court held that such an arbitration should be treated the same as a court judgment with respect to the doctrine of issue preclusion. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:42 am
In so doing, the trial court exceeded the scope of its authority in a hearing in damages by failing to treat the allegations of the plaintiff's complaint as proven facts. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:57 pm by Michael Mau
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:43 am by Lorene Park
In a June 11, 2012 decision (Chapter 7 Trustee v Gate Gourmet, Inc, Carnes, E), the Eleventh circuit determined that a pregnant employee who was denied light duty by her supervisor and then terminated did not need to provide evidence of a nonpregnant coworker who was treated more favorably in order to defeat summary judgment on her pregnancy discrimination claim. [read post]