Search for: "Tripp's Case" Results 61 - 80 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 1:22 pm by Steven Koprince
Tripp conceded that an order, ordinarily, is a “contract,” Justice Kagan asked why that concession doesn’t “answer the case. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Hauck, had concerned a trade mark for the shape of a child’s high chair (the “Tripp Trapp”) the design of which was also protected by copyright. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
No "mix and match" of the functionality objectionsThe CJEU confirmed that its earlier Hauck decision (regarding the Tripp-Trapp chair, C-205/13) had effectively already answered Arnold J's Question 2. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
 [readers may recall that this issue has been recently addressed in Hauck, also known as the Tripp Trapp case and noted here]3) Should Article 3(1)(e)(ii) of [the Trade Marks Directive] be interpreted as precluding registration of shapes which are necessary to obtain a technical result with regard to the manner in which the goods are manufactured as opposed to the manner in which the goods function? [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
In the present case, since the national court found that the shape of the Tripp Trapp high chair gives substantial value to it within the meaning of the third indent of Article 3(1)(e) of Directive 89/104, and thus as a whole satisfies the requirements for application of that ground, the fact that that shape also provides other characteristics, such as safety and ergonomic requirements, which could additionally be considered from the point of view of the ground contained in the… [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
The case is Minder Music & Another v Sharples. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
  Court decisions basically recognize it is not appropriate to grant the same level of copyright protection to industrial products as in the case of fine arts. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 In the first, again involving Nestlé (who were opposing registration of Unilever's Viennetta ice cream shape, Case C-7/03), the case was settled and the referral withdrawn. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
The petitioners also place reliance upon a report by Special Referee Tripp in Matter of Leahy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am by Ronald Mann
That comes every day in the week, it comes up in criminal cases, civil cases all the time. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am by Jani
Peter Opsvik, a co-defendant in the case, had designed a children's chair called "Tripp Trapp", being sold under the Stokke brand since the early 1970s. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
On the jiplp weblog there's an analysis of the Court of Justice of the European Union's latest "clarification" of European law on the registration of product shapes as trade marks in Hauck v Stokke, the "Tripp Trapp" chair case. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Describing trade mark protection as the finger that is pointed at a product, as distinct from the protection of the product itself, Annette explained that the two notions are effectively merged in the case of three-dimensional products. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
German case law has shown this to to be the case in litigation over cantilevered chairs such as that illustrated on the left,  In the Netherlands too, the scope of protection of the TRIPP TRAPP chair appears to have been whittled down over time. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Steven Boutwell
Trippe Hawthorne Act 759 of 2014 updated and amended a number of aspects of Louisiana’s Public Bid Law, set out at La. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
  Jeremy gives the floor to Valentina Torelli, who drafts a detailed report of the General Court's decision in Case T-453/11 LAGUIOLE. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Tripp Trapp and the Third Dimension: a study in trade mark registrability Here’s the much awaited IPKat comment on  Case C‑205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co. [read post]