Search for: "Trojan v. Trojan" Results 61 - 80 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2009, 4:04 am by John L. Welch
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral argument in an appeal from the TTAB's decision in University of Southern California v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
To be sure, in a series of cases staring with the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm by Rick Hasen
That’s my contribution to a NYT “Room for Debate” forum on the Bluman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 12:30 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Wer heute schon Trojaner einsetzt und genehmigt, verspottet deshalb unseren demokratischen Rechtsstaat. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
University of Southern California v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:08 pm
Contents include: Álvaro Paúl, Translation Challenges of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Cost-Effective Proposals for Improvement Ajit Singh, American Convention on Human Rights Articles 46(1)(a) and 46(2)(c): Achilles Heel or Trojan Horse? [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 1:20 pm
 Last, but not least, Hugh Stephens reports on his blog (Hugh Stephens Blog) how harmful are the Remote Access Trojans (RATs), which are sometimes embedded in websites offering pirated goods. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that (a) the American Arbitration Association and the designated arbitrator "are protected by immunity, as their acts were performed in their arbitral capacity", citing Trojan v Cipolla & Co., 172 AD3d 569 and (b) Plaintiff "fails to plead, as is necessary to sustain a claim against an unincorporated association, that the entire membership authorized and later ratified its actions, noting the Court of Appeals ruling in Palladino v CNY… [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that (a) the American Arbitration Association and the designated arbitrator "are protected by immunity, as their acts were performed in their arbitral capacity", citing Trojan v Cipolla & Co., 172 AD3d 569 and (b) Plaintiff "fails to plead, as is necessary to sustain a claim against an unincorporated association, that the entire membership authorized and later ratified its actions, noting the Court of Appeals ruling in Palladino v CNY… [read post]