Search for: "U. S. v. All Monies" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 50825(U)(Fam Ct.,2020) the Court observed that the purpose of a forensic evaluation in court for purposes of therapeutic interventions Cthat is the parents= responsibility. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (a), there exists “a rebuttable presumption that counsel fees shall be awarded to the less monied spouse. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  He argued that the clause was indistinguishable from clauses enforced in other dissolution cases including Ehrlich v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
  And at this stage, the Court had to accept all of Ganek’s allegations as true. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
  And at this stage, the Court had to accept all of Ganek’s allegations as true. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
  And at this stage, the Court had to accept all of Ganek’s allegations as true. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:46 am by Peter Mahler
 Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 4, 2018]. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Handelsman v Bedford Village Associates, L.P., applied Carden‘s logic to LLCs, holding that they too have the same citizenship as all their members. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What it was attempting to do was to make the point that the Supreme Court had never come close to offering a cogent analysis of what it actually meant by “one person/one vote” and therefore the mantra of “equality” in voting power, which, after all, was the basis of Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]