Search for: "U. S. v. Hill"
Results 61 - 80
of 383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
Hill, supra. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Kirk v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Kleronomos v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:57 am
Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp., 182 AD2d 560 [1992] [reply papers should not be used to raise new arguments]). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:55 am
Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp., 182 AD2d 560 [1992] [reply papers should not be used to raise new arguments]). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, it must be alleged that “but for” the attorney’s conduct, the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am
Prospect Capital Corp. v Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 33797(U)October 25, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653941/2022 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:00 am
Dennis Webster v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Retirement Plan for General Employees v McGraw-Hill Cos., 120 AD3d 1052, 2014 NY Slip Op 06154 [1st Dept Sept. 11, 2014], in which the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the trial court’s ruling dismissing a books-and-records proceeding brought against McGraw-Hill, and held that the petitioning pension fund’s stated purpose of the requested inspection, to investigate the board’s oversight of… [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Last post, we discussed Gad v Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 34357(U) December 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156841/2021 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:26 am
Harsco Corporation v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports on the impact that the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 7:32 am
U. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:55 pm
County of Cook, 884 F.2d 1043, 1047 (7th Cir. 1989), quoting Hill v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:51 am
Aaron McCoy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Dalton v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
