Search for: "U. S. v. Marin" Results 61 - 80 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 12:37 pm by Daniel Nazer
Indeed, Justice Gorsuch’s dissent includes a similar hypothetical and notes that it is a “very odd role for U. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Matz v Aboulafia Law Firm, LLC  2017 NY Slip Op 32147(U)  October 10, 2017  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 15506/2016 Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Amici express no opinion on the procedural questions raised in Part IV of McCauley's brief.) [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Addressing Kaspersky’s argument that its injury stems from its inability to sell its products to the U. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, since the retainer agreement executed between plaintiffs and the Aboulafia firm, which constitutes “documentary evidence” within the purview of that section (see generally Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 84-85 [2d Dept 2010]), clearly limits the firm’s representation only to commencing a property damage claim against Marine. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Taken together, BRI’s different components serve Beijing’s vision for regional integration under its helm. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Matz v Aboulafia Law Firm, LLC  2017 NY Slip Op 32147(U)  October 10, 2017  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 155506/2016  Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
DC” for clothing items; “ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE” for various clothing items; “BRAND NAMES FOR LESS” for retail store services; and “PROUDLY MADE IN THE USA” for electric shavers. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:41 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
” “TOTE [the EL FARO’s operator] did not ensure the safety of marine operations and failed to provide shore side nautical operations supports to its vessels. [read post]