Search for: "U. S. v. Paris" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
2015 - It's been another busy copyright year! [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And is incoherently applied in the U of Ala. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
Il est conçu pour les besoins de ce colloque dans une acception très large : il ne s’identifie en effet ni au seul précédent jurisprudentiel, ni à la pratique à proprement parler mais vise à englober tout comportement passé – en opposition précisément à l’ensemble des comportements formant une pratique – susceptible de produire des effets de droit. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 1:17 pm
Cette œuvre a d’ailleurs reçu toutes les autorisations nécessaires : de la Préfecture de police, de la Mairie de Paris et du ministère de la culture, en lien avec le Comité Vendôme, qui regroupe les commerçants de la place.. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
The New York Timesheadline writers selected “American Architect” to announce Gordon Wood’s review of Cheney’s book. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Claisse at fashion shows in Paris in 2003 and published without the permission of the fashion houses. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:43 am by Douglas
(…) Enquanto alguns os vêem como loucos, nós vemos gênios. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Zacharakos, 2012 NY Slip Op 50947(U) (Sup Ct Kings County May 24, 2012), turning down a bid by a disappointed shareholder to require equal participation in the purchase of a departing shareholder's shares. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]