Search for: "U. S. v. Price" Results 61 - 80 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It only comes up once in a while, but Jonns v Fischbarg  2018 NY Slip Op 32353(U)  September 18, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:47 am by MICHAEL H. ERDMAN
Here's a quick overview of the proposed Final Judgment ("PFJ") filed earlier today in USA v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
ISBN: 978-0-300-12127-8 PROBABLE PRICE: $38.00 Koppelman (law & poly sci/Northwestern) has teamed up with Wolff (law/U. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The question of whether the purchase price was in fact paid became the subject of a separate action in the Supreme Court, New York County (hereinafter the New York County action), which was dismissed based upon the statute of frauds, because the plaintiffs did not produce the contract of sale (see Komolov v Segal, 40 Misc 3d 1228[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51339[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013], affd 117 AD3d 557 [2014]). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:40 am by Constanty Okolie
In summary, the Court found that the Owners could only recover the amount of hire giving credit for the sale price they in fact obtained for the Vessel after the breach. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Such a course of action makes sense only with hindsight knowledge that Flamel’s stock price was about to collapse. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:57 pm by Shireen Qaru
Supreme Court has agreed to hear Halliburton’s pitch to overrule or modify the decades old fraud-on-the-market presumption established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
  FERC’s policy, that court ruled, crosses the line and seeks to regulate retail pricing. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the hard lesson learned by the 49% LLC member in Lard-PT, LLC v Seokoh, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51208(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 20, 2020], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok denied the 49% member’s summary judgment motion based on findings that put the 51% member on a winning path. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Nevertheless, this claim is enunciated by the Court in Allard v Gumenick 2023 NY Slip Op 32696(U) August 4, 2023 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 158750/2022 Judge: Lisa S. [read post]