Search for: "U. S. v. Sotomayor" Results 61 - 80 of 791
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Summary of Today’s Supreme Court Opinions
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by Josh Blackman
EPA, 549 U. [read post]
Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com
Surveillance, chilling, and the First and Fourth amendments
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
In an earlier post I quoted Justice Sotomayor’s statement (concurring in United States v. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina--The US Supreme Court Extends Deferential Standard to Review of Investment Treaties
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm by WIMS
S. 410 (1945); Auer v. [read post]
Environmental - Appeals Court - http://environmentalappealscourt.blogspot.com/
Forfeiture, Assets, Probable Cause, and Hiring Attorneys
26 Feb 2014, 4:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
S. [read post]
Crime and Consequences - http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/
[Jonathan H. Adler] When Justices Thomas and Sotomayor dissent together
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Voisine v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Justice Sotomayor Gets Judicial "Courage" Backwards
11 Dec 2021, 3:15 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Sotomayor's dissent in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Lewis v. Clarke, Docket 15-1500
21 Jun 2017, 12:42 pm
Lee, 446 U. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty., Docket 16-466
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
Shutts, 472 U. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez: Supreme Court Holds that Unaccepted Settlement Offer Does Not Moot Class Action
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am by Steven G. Pearl
S. 308, Little v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court Holds Attorney-Client Privilege Rulings Not Immediately Appealable As Collateral Orders
8 Dec 2009, 7:23 am by Maxwell Kennerly
S., at 377; Cobbledick v. [read post]
Litigation and Trial - Max Kennerly - http://www.litigationandtrial.com/
SCOTUS: Quon decided; City’s access of employee’s text messages was reasonable under O’Connor v. Ortega
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
Quon decided; city’s access of employee’s text messages was reasonable under O’Connor v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Supreme Court Uphold Kansas Insanity Defense Test in Kahler v Kansas
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Kansas, 589 U. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
Southern Union Co. v. United States
22 Jun 2012, 1:53 pm by WIMS
S. 466 (2000); Blakely v. [read post]
Environmental - Appeals Court - http://environmentalappealscourt.blogspot.com/
Want to invalidate a patent in litigation? You still need to prove invalidity with clear and convincing evidence - Microsoft v. i4i
9 Jun 2011, 9:39 am by Woodrow Pollack
” 35 U. [read post]
Florida IP - http://floridaip.blogspot.com/
Microsoft Corp. v. Baker - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
14 Jul 2017, 2:29 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion was joined by Justices Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
Federalist Society SCOTUScast - http://fedsoc.server326.com/audio/SCOTUScast/SCOTUScast.xml
Golan v. Saada – a case on the HCCH Child Abduction Convention: the Opinion of the US Supreme Court is now available
16 Jun 2022, 2:02 am by Mayela Celis
The decision was written by Justice Sotomayor, click here. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
Three thoughts on U.S. v. Jones
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am by Margot Kaminski
Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Jones v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Mont v United States: Supreme Court Rules Pretrial Detention Can Toll Term of Federal Supervised Release
13 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
In Mont v United States, 587 U. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/