Search for: "U. S. v. Various Articles of Device" Results 61 - 76 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Frosh, Bowie knife laws are an important part of his argument, including with a citation to my article Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
To see why “contracting around conflicts” may be a necessary option, consider this graphic of all the mobile device companies suing other mobile device companies. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
” Within that statutory framework, a “moped” was defined as “[a] vehicle that has two or three wheels, no external shifting device, and a motor that does not exceed 50 cubic centimeters piston displacement and cannot propel the vehicle at a speed greater than 30 miles per hour on a level surface. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
2015 - It's been another busy copyright year! [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:19 pm by Andis Kaulins
Article 1 of the Electronic Documents Law states: "an electronic document - any electronically created, stored, sent or received data, which ensures the possibility to use it for the performance of any action, for the use and protection of any rights. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A low-cost alternative, if it materializes, may tempt smaller activists—perhaps including better-funded versions of the “issues” activists now plastering corporate boardrooms with various 14a-8 stockholder proposals—to nominate one or two directors to press their concerns in the boardroom.[1] However, Rule 14a-19 does not address the longstanding question of just what information the nominating stockholder should disclose to voting stockholders. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Robert Milligan
 The court found that the ITC has jurisdiction through section 337 of the Tariff Act, which prohibits “[u]nfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation of articles … into the United States…. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
Prior to TRIPS, international IP protection did not factor in the multilateral trading system’s legal framework, and the GATT is mostly silent on the relationship between international trade and IP rights. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
District Court for the Central District of California, Lifoam Industries is required to pay a $450,000 penalty and must vent all of its manufacturing emissions through an air pollution control device. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The students reported various symptoms, including burning or stinging eyes, worsened allergies, and a bad taste in the mouth. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
See,  http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Options-Available-For-U-S-Taxpayers-with-Undisclosed-Foreign-Financial-Assets. [read post]