Search for: "U.S. Cellular"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm
Court of Appeals in Atlanta—one of six U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:40 pm
And it reaffirms the circuit split that makes the issue ripe for U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:39 pm
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8226015.htmlThis patent based on U.S. [read post]
HOW WIRELESS CARRIERS HAMSTRING YOUR SMARTPHONE: “A team at the University of Michigan and Microsof…
27 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
HOW WIRELESS CARRIERS HAMSTRING YOUR SMARTPHONE: “A team at the University of Michigan and Microsoft Research has uncovered, for the first time, the frequently suboptimal network practices of more than 100 cellular carriers. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:57 am
This year, the world's car makers will have to upgrade their cellular standard-essential patent (SEP) licenses from 4G to 5G. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:39 am
While the White Sox's U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:39 am
Smida, 2008 U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:17 am
’s (“Core Wireless’s”) motion for judgment as a matter of law that Apple infringed a claim of a Core Wireless patent directed to a means for sending packet data from a mobile station such as a cellular telephone to a cellular system or network, the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
On March 1, 2016, the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:55 am
[DHS] agrees that the use of IMSI catchers by foreign governments may threaten U.S. national and economic security. [read post]
17 May 2019, 5:15 am
The mobile phone industry has exploded over the last decade with nearly all U.S. consumers owning a smart phone. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:07 am
Perr, co-managing partner of the KDV Philadelphia office and chair of Consumer Financial Services practice group Bloomberg Law l May 21, 2020 The U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:19 am
CA and U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 10:17 am
On August 7, the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:23 am
In a pending trial in federal court in Boston in the case U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
By way of background, the investigation is based on a complaint filed by Otter Products, LLC (“Otter”) alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain protective cases and components thereof that infringe several U.S. utility and design patents. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:53 am
The ruling (PDF) examines the government’s attempt to get data from the undisclosed service provider amid a U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 10:10 am
The Commission rejected respondent's argument that complainant was not entitled to a cease and desist order for its infringed patent for encoding signals in a cellular telephone network because of complainant's FRAND commitments. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 11:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office and the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 11:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office and the U.S. [read post]
