Search for: "U.S. v. Clifton*" Results 61 - 80 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 5:19 pm
So holds Judge Clifton.Pretty expansive view of the Interstate Commerce Clause, eh? [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:42 pm
 The panel consists of Judges Gould, Clifton and Watford. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:07 pm
 Judge Clifton begins the thing with a nice little summary:"It is a crime to produce outside the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and to then transport that visual depiction into the United States. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
  Because I've seen better.It's not that Judge Clifton necessarily gets this one wrong. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
The district court's acts, such as redaction and the limiting instruction, distinguished this case from U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:52 pm
Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398 (1981); see also Clifton v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
Say, for example, it's a U.S. immigration case, bu the client has already moved to Canada, where he prefers to stay anyway. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:55 am
CLIFTON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court as to Part II(E), in which TASHIMA, J., joined. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:23 am
I think that Judge Clifton (who writes the majority opinion) does a good job of articulating his view, and that Judge Gibson -- who's sitting by designation from the Eighth Circuit and who dissents -- does a fairly mediocre job of articulating the contrary view.Regardless, I like the query. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Which is sometimes efficient (though a hassle to follow), at least with larger panels.But here, Judges Clifton and Fernandez both agree on every issue, and so Judge Clifton writes a "concurring" opinion that Judge Fernandez joins. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:04 am
Yes.That's basically what Chief Judge Schroeder says in this long-running dispute regarding whether everyone who initially appears before a federal magistrate judge in Los Angeles will be shackled.Judge Schroeder originally wrote an opinion -- back in November 2005 -- that held that the uniform shackling policy implemented in the Central District was impermissible, over the dissent of Judge Clifton. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:29 pm
(I smiled when Judge Clifton explained in footnote 2 of the opinion: "Marin is the county immediately north of San Francisco, across the Golden Gate Bridge. [read post]