Search for: "U.S. v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 8:17 am
EPA, 597 U.S. 697 (2022) and Biden v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the regulation. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
District Judge Curtis L. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
A 2018 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
” So wrote U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The obstacle to all of that work was the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reinstated the charge against Fischer, whose petition for Supreme Court review was granted earlier this year. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Susan V. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear oral argument in Assassination Archives and Research Center v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia includes two counts based on the statute at issue in Fischer. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear oral argument in Cabezas v, FBI, No. 22-5170. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
After Murphy, 38 states and the District of Columbia legalized sports gambling. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
” Justice Eddins is referencing District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to a monetary settlement of $110,759 (which will go to the impacted individual), the company has agreed to modify its employment related policies and training practicesIn a written statement, EEOC Philadelphia Regional Attorney Debra M. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:30 am
See Estrada v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
” That quotation from the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 7:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Steve Bannon's appeal of his conviction for violating Title 2, United States Code, Section 192 by willfully refusing to... [read post]
