Search for: "U.S. v. Fant*"
Results 61 - 80
of 688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
American Trucking Ass’n, 531 U.S. 457 (2001). [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm
The U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm
Ditko, U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm
CIRCUIT AND U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am
That figure is larger than it was shortly after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Earlier this term, the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
I am delighted to announce that the essays in Volume 16(1) of Emancipating the Mind: Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics (Summer 2021) (ISSN 2689-0283 (Print); 2689-0291 (Online); ISBN 978-1-949943-06-1) are now available.This issue includes essays on Contemporary China--Heartland, Periphery, and Silk Roads. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Like the J.B. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 2:08 am
Wilson et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
(There is a deep split on the subject among federal and state appellate courts, and the Supreme Court's 2015 U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
The Lanham Act seems to say no, and the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:15 am
According to ABC News:With more than two dozen states poised to ban abortion if the U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:12 pm
After two years there I went into the U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
Murthy, Health Misinformation: The U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm
Despite Congressional intent for whistleblowers to receive de novo review, a 2018 ruling in Kasper v. [read post]
