Search for: "U.S. v. Hands*" Results 61 - 80 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 9:33 pm by Thomas Zeno
  Although “some of the government’s tactics here leave something to be desired,” a unanimous panel in US v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 2:13 am by Keith Mallinson
”  And yet, Apple’s much-published arguments were also that Qualcomm’s non-SEPs are not worth much.Qualcomm’s licensing-for-money business model was the most lucrative target for Apple in potential cost savings, because licensing by Ericsson and Nokia—that used to license defensively to protect handset business downstream and still have large downstream network e [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Florian Mueller
Either one wants to argue that indirectly-imposed costs count, or one doesn't.Expect more posts on FTC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:09 am by Florian Mueller
But there was a service-of-process dispute as the U.S. entity pointed to the Hague Convention (which according to the Avanci defendants' motion to dismiss Continental's U.S. lawyers may have failed to comply with when attempting to serve Sharp Japan). [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
The Clerk shall close the file.Judge Koh's underlying findings of fact and conclusions of law, however, span 233 pages (this post continues below the document):19-05-21 FTC v. [read post]