Search for: "U.S. v. Rakoff"
Results 61 - 80
of 233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Rakoff. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:16 pm
Rakoff, The Honorable Cathy Seibel and U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:59 am
Hosted in the Big Apple, it brought together great people and some legal luminaries—like Judge Jed Rakoff, U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Gigliotti, 2015 U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:39 pm
Background As part of a recruiting campaign for the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:21 pm
Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari to review the ruling by Judge Jed Rakoff in the case of Salman v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
The U.S. government’s petition for writ of certiorari in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
Wegman's Food Markets, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:40 am
For more information call 212-509-6544 or send an email to mja@sallahlaw.com.Related Documents and Commentary:Duka v SEC Decision and Order Re Preliminary InjunctionDuka vs. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), and the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
A copy of Judge Rakoff’s opinion can be found here. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:28 pm
Lynch, U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
Shelton, 535 U.S. 654 (2002), Judge Owens lamented that the panel's opinion "wiped" § 117(a) "off the books. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
In the wake of U.S v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Moreover, even if an element of a pecuniary benefit from tippee to tipper was required, as Gupta argued, such a benefit was proved against Gupta at trial (U.S. v. [read post]
