Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTY, named as John Doe" Results 61 - 80 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2009, 9:56 am
First there are unique evidentiary requirements to filing a suit against an unknown "John Doe" driver. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:37 pm
Lawyers frequently use the "John Doe" lawsuit mechanism, in fact, when a defendant's identity is unknown. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 9:49 am
In the Best Western case, the plaintiff filed suit against several John Doe defendants alleging a number of causes of action, including breach of contract, unfair competition and defamation. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:06 am by David Canton
Doe case, where the Canadian Recording Industry Association tried to get the names of online music file sharers. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:53 pm by Josh Blackman
Sam demonstrated that this sort of non-party relief would have been unknown in the courts of equity. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Virginia courts (both state and federal) have found that merely filing a John Doe action against an unknown defendant will not toll the statute of limitations, and that the defendant must be named within the applicable limitations period or the claim will be extinguished. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:30 am by Jani
[l]imiting the information provided by the third party by releasing only the name and residential address but not telephone numbers and e-mail addresses... [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 7:55 am
Zrinyi, Greene, and John or Jane Does I-V, Unknown Persons, 2008 WL 4649131 (D. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Los Angeles Unified School Dist., it might not be hard for people to identify L.V. based on her representative's (likely her parent's) name.[29] Likewise, if a Complaint filed by John Doe in a libel case quotes the alleged libel, a quick Google search for the libel could identify its target. [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:45 am
And so the Board sustained opposer's claim under Section 2(e)(4).Abandonment: Applicant urged the Board to consider opposer's Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion claim in order to put to rest the controversy between the parties as to which is entitled to claim rights in the AZEKA name in the future. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am by David Pocklington
Section 3 of the Burial Act 1853 makes it unlawful ‘to bury the dead’ in a closed churchyard, and the interment of cremated remains does not amount to the burial of the dead as intended by that statutory section. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by David Pocklington
Section 3 of the Burial Act 1853 makes it unlawful ‘to bury the dead’ in a closed churchyard, and the interment of cremated remains does not amount to the burial of the dead as intended by that statutory section. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am by David Pocklington
Section 3 of the Burial Act 1853 makes it unlawful ‘to bury the dead’ in a closed churchyard, and the interment of cremated remains does not amount to the burial of the dead as intended by that statutory section. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 5:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
On or about July 19, 2020, Doe (whose true identity and location are unknown) created an Instagram account under the username "asu_covid.parties. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
And if reputation is an Article 8 right, can it be right that the court should determine an application for an interim injunction to restrain the publication of material which if published would be injurious to the claimant’s reputation without investigating, evaluating or striking the balance between the parties’ competing Article 8 and Article 10 claims, without subjecting the parties’ asserted rights to the ‘intense focus on the comparative importance of… [read post]
Procedural Steps In most cases, companies sue the hackers as “John Does” because their identities are unknown. [read post]