Search for: "US Fidelis, Inc"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:24 am
“Something more than the operation of a landing or PPC page is required to show lack of bona fide use,” Starmail Distributors Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
FD Management, Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1629 (TTAB 2007) ("an application will not be deemed void for lack of a bona fide intention to use absent proof of fraud, or proof of a lack of bona fide intention to use the mark on all of the goods identified in the application, and not just some of them."). [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:32 am
Donald Drummonds, D2001-0160 (WIPO June 18, 2001) ( and for noncommercial, fair use and free speech, Covance, Inc. and Covance Laboratories Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
Aaron’s, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
” The Federal Circuit cited its 2009 Aycock Eng’g Inc. v Airflite, Inc. ruling, which explained the use requirement for a service mark. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
"And so the Board found that Nestle had failed to establish a prima facie case of lack of bona fide intent.TTABlog comment: The bona fide intent discussion is the most interesting part here. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Enjoy. - dkh) General Media Comm., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
An applicant's capacity to make or market the involved goods is evidence supporting a bona fide intent to use. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:11 am
In October 2007, Medtronic stopped marketing Fidelis, issued a recall of unused Fidelis devices, and instructed physicians to cease using Fidelis. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
To prove such an intention, a party must show that "its activities are those that a reasonable businessman with a bona fide intent to use the mark in United States would have undertaken. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
" (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) In his March 5, 2008 article -- "Medical device safety in spotlight; M.D. uses Medtronic recall in critique of FDA, manufacturers" -- reporter Christopher Snowbeck explores how the Sprint Fidelis lead wire recall in October 2007 by Medtronic Inc. showed the medical device safety system as it currently operates here in the U.S. is fundamentally flawed. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Gateway Science and Engineering, Inc. (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1099. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:56 am
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:02 am
January 28, 2020 - 2 PM: Progressive Beverages, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:47 am
" Adamson Systems Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:32 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC, 2020 USPQ2d 513 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 3:22 am
December 7, 2016 - 11 AM: Executive Coach Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
