Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 61 - 80
of 8,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
Priority entitlement was an issue because neither the priority co-applicant and inventor Dr. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:49 am
(2) What Inventors Need to Know About The New Patent Law (1) [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
" Nu Science argued that the public will see, understand, and pronounce applicant’s mark as "Ev’s Food" because they "(1) will see and understand 'EV' as short for 'Everett Story,' (2) know 'Everett Storey' either as the inventor of Opposer’s CELLFOOD supplement or as a trademark used by Opposer, and therefore (3) will view the mark EVSFOOD as a hybrid of EVERETT STOREY and CELLFOOD. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
As I noted above, Lingo uses that precise color scheme. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
Master Lock Co., the Federal Circuit noted that the Supreme Court’s decision in KSR “directed us to construe the scope of analogous art broadly. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:27 pm
These patent lawsuits don’t have much to do with what most people think of when they think about “inventors” or inventions. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
While the Pokémon comparison is clear, some have called into question both how Pals were created, claiming the use of A.I., and how similar some are to Game Freak’s own Pokémon designs. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
Goodman and Patterson enrich this literature with two case studies involving patent applications for useful inventions related to Black hair care. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:58 am
Nevertheless, it did not rule out the possibility of humans using AI in the invention process from being considered inventors. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:14 pm
Patent Protections of Gene Editing Technology There are three types of patents that an inventor may file with the USPTO: utility, design, and plant. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:17 am
At McKee Voorhees and Sease (MVS) we are always eager to recognize the achievements of women – the inventors and creators we proudly represent, the pioneers who lead the way before us, as well as the talented women in practice at our firm. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:15 am
▫️For more information, please use this link: https://linktr.ee/TheInventor▫️Congrats to the entire team on this great news.✨@blue_fox_entertainment presents @theinventorfilmWritten and Directed by: @capobianco_jimCo-Director: @pierrelucgranjonProduced by: @rrippberger @capobianco_jimProducers: @adrianpolitowski Martin Metz @curiositystudio @foliascope✨Cast: @daisyridley @marioncotillard @stephenfryactually @battoue @mattberrymusic▫️Be… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:44 am
The court went on to explain that that an inventor who withholds his invention from the public for his own indefinite and exclusive profit does not promote, and would impede, the progress of science and the useful arts. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 6.02[5][b] (2022) (“[I]t is now well established that commercial exploitation by the inventor of a machine or process constitutes a public use even though the machine or process is held secret. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:09 pm
A natural person's use of an AI system in creating an AI-assisted invention does not negate the person's contributions as an inventor.[53] The natural person can be listed as the inventor or joint inventor if the natural person contributes significantly to the AI-assisted invention. 2. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:21 am
Inventors who are part of an inventor group of up to four known inventors must meet the qualifications listed above. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm
By December 1996, the two inventors of the ’094 patent changed their employer from USF to Mayo Clinic. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 11:15 am
So artificial intelligence cannot be an inventor, but what if artificial intelligence is only used to assist in the creation of the invention? [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
Reasonably Pertinent Test: This test asks whether the reference is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor was involved A reference that fits either of these categories is considered analogous art and then can be used in the obviousness analysis. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
This is the reward granted to inventors for a) making the invention and b) sharing that invention with the general public. [read post]
