Search for: "US v. Anthony Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 1,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
As he has done with two other such cert denials since 2019, Justice Clarence Thomas dissented and used the opportunity to call on the Court to revisit the actual malice requirement. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 23 conference)  Anthony v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
Wade and of cases like Griswold v Connecticut, which recognized the right of married couples to use contraception, because the word privacy was not used in the Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am by Radhika Rao
Blackmun, used to say. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Linda Greenhouse, then still the New York Times Supreme Court reporter, was an essential participant in the symposium, as was Anthony Tomassini, then the chief classical music critic for the Times. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Appellate Judges Thomas Hardiman, Paul Matey, and Senior Circuit Judge Anthony Scirica were unanimous in rejecting the claim. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Even some of us who had long supported same-sex marriage raised concerns at the time over the reliance of Justice Anthony Kennedy in his decision on a “right to dignity. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Blackmun used to complain that pundits who described his evolution were wrong. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
In a concurring opinion, Breyer agreed with Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas that the monument should be allowed to remain. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Justice Anthony Kennedy concurred only in the judgment, applying a more fact-intensive (critics would say vague) “significant nexus” test. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
A missing apostrophe in a Facebook post could cost real estate agent Anthony Zadravic thousands of dollars after a court ruled a defamation case against him could proceed. [read post]