Search for: "US v. Battle" Results 61 - 80 of 8,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
It may use AI capabilities in its own operations to increase efficiency and value for shareholders. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am by Dylan Gibbs
— Dylan GibbsTODAY'S DOCKET6-min readLimitation periods and Indigenous rightsForcing part of a lawsuit to arbitrationTrial by ambushGuess WhoINDIGENOUS LAWBest we can do is a declarationShot Both Sides v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[7] The commission would seize objects from “museums, churches, and private collections” and decide whether to keep, destroy, or sell them.[8] However, following Napoleon’s defeat at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, the French were forced to return pieces of their looted collection to their respective countries.[9] The French conditioned the return of the pieces on the works being made accessible to the public.[10] Moreover, in the case of Marquis de Somerueles, the… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
Before I get to the substance of these remarks, it may be useful to briefly describe the ordering concepts that frame the analysis that follows.[2]   The first ordering concept  draws from the reference in the title to “the signal,” is to the now ancient 2005 movie Serenity.[3] More specifically to the insights offered by the intergalactic hacker, Mr. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:54 pm by Aaron Moss
The Bottom Line While the Ninth Circuit has touted the value of expert witnesses in several of its recent (albeit unpublished) opinions, Yonay v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In 1982, the US Supreme Court ruled that 'a state cannot prevent the children of undocumented immigrants from attending public school.' " [read post]