Search for: "US v. Burrell"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2012, 7:18 am
First, the Burrell Court ordered, pursuant to Va. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
In Shirley Frazier Burrell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:30 pm
At deposition in the current Burrell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Waterman filed Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum in Shirley Frazier Burrell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:59 pm
Hendow v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:23 am
, Bethel v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am
Burrell also points to a related result in Musidor BV v Tansing (1994) 52 FCR 363 (Federal Court of Australia – Full Court) (use of “The Rolling Stones” on the cover of lawful but unauthorized sound recordings was legitimate). [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Other cases finding use as a mark: Coca-Cola v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Burrell Day and Joel McDaniel. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
If you look historically, there are many examples of the latter and very few of the former—courts talking about the nature of the right, e.g., Prestonettes v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
The court’s entire decision can be found at Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
In the case of Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:19 am
In Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:05 am
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Rhoades v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:42 am
Wood v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
In Milton v. [read post]
