Search for: "US v. Carlton May" Results 61 - 80 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2019, 4:08 am
For instance, capturing the “total concept and feel” of a dance by reproducing what may otherwise be perceived as basic or uncreative elements may nevertheless suffice to rule for infringement (see Roth Greeting Cards v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:45 am by Leila Wozniak
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, 2018 WL 3127423, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
That may be appealing to the court given that it may be harder to form a majority with now-Justice Kavanaugh recused because of his prior participation. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 20, April 27, May 10, May 17, May 24, May 31, June 7, June 14 and June 21 conferences; apparently held pending approval of a settlement agreement)   Wood v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly used Moore v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Robert MacAneyney and John Pitblado of the Carlton Fields law firm (here), the problem that these kinds of situation present from an insurance coverage standpoint is that in one of these payment fraud situations “the fraudster is not so much using a computer, as they are using a human dupe, who then conducts the authorized, nonfraudlent uses of a computer … unwittingly furthering the fraud. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  On March 15, 2018, the company announced that the SEC investigation “could result in a delay of the tZero security token offering, negative publicity for tZero or us, and may have a material adverse effect on us or on the current and future business ventures of tZero. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:49 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Defendants may be required to sit in a “dock,” an area that may be enclosed by glass or metal. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 am by INFORRM
  Furthermore, CPR 7.3 provides that a claimant may use a single claim for “to start all claims which can be conveniently disposed of in the same proceedings. [read post]