Search for: "US v. Daniel Alexander" Results 61 - 80 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Alexander Chemers and Robert Roginson discuss the opinion at Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
” [29] In essence, not only represented traditional committees would be subject to the disclosure rules, but also ad hoc committees. [30] V. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:42 am by Gail Heriot
But, there, Larry was just being mainstream: He was agreeing with the Supreme Court in Washington v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
| Bad faith confirmed for ALEXANDER trade mark application? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Fellow blogger, tweeter and IP enthusiast Thomas Dubuissontells us about a larger than life dispute between Google and Oracle that is rumbling through the courts in the US. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Eleonora Rosati
The deputy judge, Daniel Alexander QC, found there was no infringement by the Defendant in its use of the name “Photobox Free Prints” and that there was no passing off by the use of this name or the Defendant’s logo + word combination app icon, despite the Claimant having taken extensive steps to acquire a secondary meaning for its otherwise descriptive “FreePrints” name.But the deputy judge did find trade mark infringement, on both… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:36 am by Jennifer Davis
KHD2009.G38 C37 2018 Cardinali, Daniel Carvalho. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The same could also apply to a company registration.Is this a new cause of action for us trade mark lawyers to start waving around? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Alexander Payne, Note, Rebuilding the prevent defense: why unethical agents continue to score and what can be done to change the game, 13 VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT & TECHNOLOGY LAW 657 (2011)David Pepper, Comment, Anand v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Here, Greene asserted that viewers would view him as a criminal who used drugs and partied with prostitutes. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
 A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]