Search for: "US v. Edward Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
In a dissenting opinion, Senior Judge Davis succinctly explained why the majority’s “crabbed plausibility analysis” was wrong: 3. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am by WSLL
Edwards of Stevens, Edwards, Hallock, Carpenter & Phillips, P.C., Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee American National Bank (Defendant /Plaintiff):  Clint A. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Galloway: Constitutional Challenges to State Sponsored Prayers at Local Government Meetings, (47 UC Davis Law Review, (2014 Forthcoming)).Edward A. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Watkins, “holding that religious tests may not be used to decide who holds public office” Engel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Parke Davis & Co., 402 N.E.2d 194, 198-99 (Ill. 1980); Needham v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:32 am by Broc Romanek
Also check out these industry-specific recaps of conflict mineral reporting from Deloitte… Debate: Safe Harbors v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
The conference was chaired by Edward Coleman of Surrett & Coleman of Augusta, Georgia and opening remarks were also made by Kurt Kegel of Davis Matthews and Quigley in Atlanta, Chair of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Al mes siguiente también siguió la misma suerte el caso que, por accidente, ganaría el primer lugar en el rótulo: Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Perhaps the Supreme Court will limit itself to deciding the relatively benign question of required procedures, parsing constitutional text and arguments in the standard manner.[23] Except that recent history suggests that the Court might instead use SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This is the subject of a couple of proceedings that took place in the US where jewellery featuring a line of products named "The Bette Davis Eyes" was up against the company that holds the rights related to the iconic Hollywood actress. [read post]