Search for: "US v. John Alexander" Results 61 - 80 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm by Monroe Freedman
Defendants' own press release described its proposed rules as protecting consumers against 'potentially misleading ads,'" the panel wrote in Alexander v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on  Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:16 am
The Federalist Papers are a series of articles published in newspapers, and essays, authored by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton (pre-Broadway musical days for you robed readers), debating the parameters of the soon to be US Constitution. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times writes about the oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
Holder), narrowed the use of race in redistricting (Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
If you’ve enjoying this series, please subscribe to the Lawfare Podcast on iTunes or on whatever service you use to listen to podcasts. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 GuestKat Thomas Key discussed the ruling, issued by the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 50 cent v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
Mere reputation was not sufficient to amount to goodwill.]while we also liked his other two submissions:Robert Alexander Johnstone and others (2003)The HOL worked to construe,The ambit of section Nine Two,And undid convictionBy use of description,And pissed off the BPI too. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC A newly published book in the US examines the “lifespan of a fact” through seven years of “arguments, negotiations, and revisions” between essayist John D’Agata and fact checker Jim Fingal. [read post]