Search for: "US v. John Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 1,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
United States, 3 U.S. 171, Abraham Lincoln, and Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
The Andrew Johnson administration understood [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
  Professor Amar's view is that "we must remember that it is a Constitution that we are expounding" that would last "for the ages" as John Marshall said in McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
First, the law requires some business to verify the age of users using age verification software. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Unknown
By John Filar AtwoodThe CFTC has proposed to update the requirements underlying the exemption provisions of Regulation 4.7 which the Commission estimates is used by more than 800 commodity pool operators (CPOs) running 4,300 commodity pools and by more than 850 commodity trading advisers (CTAs) for thousands of trading programs. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
Citing the Supreme Court opinion in McCulloch v Maryland (1819) where our first Chief Justice John Marshall’s endorsement of the Constitution as a document intended to be read, understood, and applied by NON-lawyers, Luttig and Tribe, along with my colleague Anjani Jain of Yale encouraged me to author this essay. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 10284-22 Hodgson v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 14301-22 Clews v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00740-23 A woman v Birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation 09808-23 Boyle v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 12490-22 Portes v The… [read post]