Search for: "US v. Keith Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
See Kelley v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
Skipper Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0016p.06 Kevin Keith v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
Skipper Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0016p.06 Kevin Keith v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:29 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court's below-guideline sentence in notable opinion Monday in US v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(University of Minnesota)Chauvin Keith W. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
It was first used by Judge Moore in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Davis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Keith Northern District of Ohio at Akron 08a0354n.06 Patel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Keith Northern District of Ohio at Akron 08a0354n.06 Patel v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
Deputy Sonja V. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Keith Neff v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Kenneth Davis and Jennifer Davis (NFP), a 13-page 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam concludes:Here, the court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the attorney's fee issue, and there is no indication that it considered the parties' resources, economic condition, or other factors that would bear on the reasonableness of the award of attorney's fees. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Third, the district court properly applied the firearms sentencing enhancement because Luster reasonably could have foreseen that Davis and Johnson possessed firearms in furtherance of their large cocaine distribution enterprise.In Miller, Keith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
Davis, No. 05-3784 (6th Cir. 8/14/06).Davis had originally been sentenced to 33 months (the low end of the Guideline range), but on appeal his sentence was reversed due to an error in the version of the Guidelines that had been used and pursuant to Booker. [read post]
