Search for: "US v. Kimbrough" Results 61 - 80 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The Court agreed to hear that issue in Kimbrough v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Last year around this time,  wehad the Supreme Court's then-fresh opinion in Gall and Kimbrough to keep us warm through  long  winter  nights. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 6:55 am
From Doug Berman, the Second Circuit's en banc decision in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:51 am
Second, the Justices issued an interesting statutory interpretation decision in Ali v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:32 am
The issues raised in the appeal will be discussed in future blogs as will the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Kimbrough v United States, 128 S. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:26 pm
Today in a thoughtful  separate opinion concurring in the denial of en banc review in US v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the decision in Kimbrough v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:03 am
  Like the crack guideline at issue in Kimbrough, the child pornography guideline yields harsh and iniquitous results, not because of any empirical analysis, but solely as a result of Congressional directives. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
The Seventh Circuit today handed down an intriguing little per curian opinion dealing with the federal child porn guidelines in US v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
Indeed, what inspired what I call the LOL project was the fear that Booker's remedy augured a return in the federal system to Williams v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:41 pm
A helpful reader informed me that the Third Circuit yesterday granted rehearing en banc in US v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:36 pm
Look for the article in the upcoming edition.How to Use: Here are some bullet points on opportunities presented by Gall / Kimbrough:ââ [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:34 pm
The Denver University Law Review last year allowed me to contribute quick thoughts about the Supreme Court's work in Rita v. [read post]