Search for: "US v. Mark Daniel" Results 61 - 80 of 1,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In a case involving a whiskey bottle dog toy with important findings for retailers and brand protection, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s rulings on trademark infringement and trademark dilution in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
 A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
  In its offer the defendant had proposed (1) to change its name to a name which didn’t include the word ‘Boca’,  (2) that it would not use the name Boca as part of its trading style in Bristol or the surrounding areas, and  (3) that it would surrender its UK trade mark registration. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by Nancy Braman
(Ready for the World) against Melvin Riley, John Eaton, Daniel Dillman, Renee Atkins, and Jan Mark Land. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Users needed to use the marks to identify Stevo’s services and they used the marks only to do so. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Eleonora Rosati
(Gömböc Kutató v Szellemi Tulajdon, Court of Justice of the EU, Case C‑237/19 (April 2020))While shape trade marks comprise less than 0.5% of all EU trade marks applied for ever, us trade mark lawyers do enjoy talking about them an awful lot. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 6:24 pm by James Kwong
  The TTABlog reported that USPTO issued its final regulations under the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 and would likely be useful to trade mark practitioners who handle client’s US trade mark portfolios. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:03 am by Thomas James
On Monday, the Court granted certiorari in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
After all, granting a copyright or trademark to some work or mark means that the law restricts speech--namely the speech of others who would copy the work or use the mark without paying for a license. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
At the Sports Law Blog, Daniel Wallach handicaps the chances that the court will grant review in in Christie v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:11 am by Melissa Mitchell
In the Jack Daniel’s case, the Supreme Court carved out limitations of the Rogers test, holding that Rogers cannot shield expressive content when that content is being used as a trademark. [read post]