Search for: "US v. Mark Jacobs"
Results 61 - 80
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 am
Chatam International Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
A spokesperson for LVMH welcomed the move, stating that French ruling protects consumers from becoming a victim due to the “illicit use of trade marks”. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:15 pm
This post was authored by Katherine Baurs-Krey, Jacob D. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:06 am
See Jacobs v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:40 pm
The application of this standard can be traced back to In re Coors Brewing Co. 343 F.3d 1340 (Fed. cir. 2003) and Jacobs v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Any useful tips from readers, Merpel and Jeremy ask? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
He referred in particular to comments by Laddie J in Mercury Communications Ltd v Mercury Interactive (UK) Ltd [1995] FSR 850, at 863-865; by Jacob J in Laboratoire De La Mer Trade Marks [2002] FSR 51, at [19]; and by Aldous LJ in Thomson Holidays v Norwegian Cruise Line [2002] EWCA Civ 1828; [2003] RPC 32, at [29]. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
AskSir Robin Jacob ...Swearing in. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
Despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Iancu v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 4:26 am
The controversial Leeds United Chairman, Ken Bates, was the defendant in a remarkable harassment claim heard last week in the Leeds County Court by Judge Mark Gosnell. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Peri & Sons Farms v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
He took issue with the terminology used in trade mark law. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
Back in December 2008 Mr Justice Arnold delivered a major trade mark infringement and passing off judgment in Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:34 am
Applicant argued that, under Coors Brewing and Jacobs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
" Jacobs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
To summarize one can quote Justice Jacob in the case's first appeal in the High Court: "...the mere fact that websites can be accessed anywhere in the world does not mean, for trade mark purposes that the law should be regarded as being used everywhere in the world. [read post]
