Search for: "US v. Mark Lewis" Results 61 - 80 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
A thoughtful piece, penned by Katfriend James Sweeting, Senior Associate at Lewis Silkin. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
We hold, therefore, that Lewis requires us to apply the "intent to harm" standard to all high-speed chases. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Dynamics Corp., 249 F.3d 958, 960 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Lewis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Mark Dorman and Tracy Dorman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Developing consensus around expressive uses/use of marks in expressive works, a set of doctrines prominently associated with Rogers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:25 am by Larry Munn
Lewis Craig Trading as VIBETRAIN the Federal Court of Canada set aside a decision of the Opposition Board and allowed the opposition to the application to register the mark VIBETRAIN. [read post]
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
The TechnoLlama was first to let the IPKat know what the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit did last week in Perfect 10 v Amazon.com and Google Inc (full text of the judgment here).Left: not the TechnoLlama but the DeliLlamaThis decision is a must-read decision for anyone who is concerned with the development of copyright doctrine in the field of cached thumbnails. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 2:49 pm
Finally, on the 1709 Blog Ben Challis takes a look at copyright in yoga positions and reflects on the law of parody and this year's John Lewis advert. [read post]
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]
By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. [read post]