Search for: "US v. McFarlane"
Results 61 - 80
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 11 July 2019 Sir Andrew McFarlane handed down judgment in the case of R (TT) v Registrar General for England and Wales [2019] EWHC 1823 (Fam), the case concerning the identification of a transgender male who had given birth. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
(Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions The burden of the past and the American comic book writer: W D Wisconsin opinion and order in Gaiman v McFarlane (Trademark Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court E D Washington finds tie goes to plaintiff’s choice of Washington forum: Pacific Coast Trailers, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
A successful prosecution with the narrower continuation in the United States could then be used in the PPH. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
Events 26 September 2018, Conference 5RB, T Savoy Place,London WC2R 0BL Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The winds of change On 29 October 2021, Sir Andrew McFarlane, the President of the Family Division, published a Report entitled “Confidence and Confidentiality: Transparency in the Family Courts”. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
So while cases that are clearly nowhere near “serious harm” are easily being rebutted at the pre-action stage by reference to the new test, nothing will change: the law is still useful, and it’s very useful for defendants that the test is “serious” not just “substantial” harm. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:21 am
In Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane (2006), the Supreme Court articulated the principles of needs, compensation, and sharing as applied to both matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
" Full article: The Observer.Ben Butler's case reminds us the justice system is not infallibleEmma Sherrington, who represented Ben Butler in London Borough of Sutton v Gray & Ors [see last week's News Update], discusses the case, in The Guardian.BLOGSThe importance of being formalA discussion of the private law case of Re K (A child) 2012 EWCA Civ 1306 [above]. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
McFarlane, 207 S.W.3d 52, 72 (Mo. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
BBC News has posted an article seeking to demystify the ways in which large technology companies use harvested personal data. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Permission was granted and an appeal, principally focused on meaning, was heard by Sharp and McFarlane LJJs and Sir John Laws. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
Read the judgment: McFarlane v Relate Avon Limited [2010] EWCA Civ B1 Tribunal rejects financier’s £4m harassment claim The Times: A high-flying financier who accused her boss of sexual harassment, bringing prostitutes to business meetings and trying to have her killed by Russian hitmen has had her £4 million compensation claim dismissed by an employment tribunal How coroners have become the public voice of grieving relatives Times: “The hearing for… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
“Data Transfers to the US: Safe Harbour Declared Invalid“, Ross McKean, Datonomy Blog. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 12 February 2018, the Court of Appeal (McFarlane and Sharp LJJ and Sir John Laws) handed down judgment in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2018] EWCA Civ 170. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
This was then perpetuated by use of the “reply to all function”. [read post]
