Search for: "US v. McKenzie"
Results 61 - 80
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
Ms K’s argument was that, as per Lewisham LBC v Malcolm (2008) UKHL 43, the court cannot be expected to give legal effect to an unlawful act. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
See Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Comparisons among enterprises, among institutions, and among states, proved quite useful in drawing insights that students found profitable. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:40 pm
Arnegard v Arnegard Township, 908 NW2d 737 (ND 3/22/2018) [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
Reversed where the Government failed to disclose drug use and drug dealing by prisoner witnesses. [read post]
1 May 2018, 8:00 am
Pederson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
Events 26 February 2018, “Global Internet and Jurisdiction Conference,” Ottawa, Canada. 17 March 2018 The Media Democracy Festival, 10am-6pm, Birkbeck, University of London, Torrington Square, London WC1E 7JL Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 10:47 am
Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 10:47 am
Riches, McKenzie & Herbert LLP v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am
McKenzie discussed his education and career, including a background in photography and work on 13 terrorism bombings. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The defendant used the claimants brands on its Italian country domain website and, whilst there was no option to order the perfumes, the website included a German language option and contact details. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
”In sum, the court of appeals in Bragdon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
”In sum, the court of appeals in Bragdon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
My hope is that this exercise will provide an incentive to dig deep into both primary and secondary sources in a useful way. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 3:11 pm
Cant v London Borough of Hackney LON/00AM/LSC/2016/0231 I’m not going to go into the actual service charge issues in any depth. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
In furtherance of this a threshold test, like the test that has been introduced in the UK, would take us back toward where we should be. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Comments and suggestions (especially for compiling a useful student friendly reading list) gratefully received as this remains very much a work in progress. [read post]
