Search for: "US v. Michael Queen"
Results 61 - 80
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
, New York University, & Michael Bobek, European University Institute in Florence, Italy, "Global Governance, Global Solutions, Local Damages: A Critical Study in Effects of Judicial Councils. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am
This list keeps residents informed of the Authority's ongoing efforts to improve the quality of life for New Yorkers in public housing and to allow for the peaceful and safe use of its facilities. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
In short, German sex toy company Beate Uhse has been ordered by a Hamburg court to pay German football stars Michael Ballack (Chelsea) and Oliver Kahn (Bayern Munich) 50,000 euros each after it used their names to sell vibrators. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:04 am
Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in the case of Allen v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:12 am
The case was Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:48 am
By Dennis Crouch Ibormeith IP v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 10:37 am
(See Gumbs v Board of Elections, 143 AD2d 235 [2nd Dept 1988] [candidate used the name "Marty" in place of "Martin"]; Matter of Abinanti v Duffy, 120 AD3d 669 [2d Dept 2014] (candidate used the name "Mike" in place of "Michael")…. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
Canada Blogger Michael Geist reviews the Canadian Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Google v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
Category: 103 By: Michael Pierorazio, Contributor TitleI/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Note that the unique case cite contains an error as this is decision in the Queen’s Bench Division, not the Administrative Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
The Daily Telegraph has an interview with the defendant who argues that the courts are being used to silence and control women. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:36 pm
Can zebra stripes and polka dots be protected by US copyright? [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
The Queens Chronicle describes how New York citizens have mustered an effort to convince Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz to dig into the conduct of Brad Leventhal the trial prosecutor in State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 178 the Supreme Court recognized that all that is necessary to make a criminal offence subject to the jurisdiction of our courts is that a significant portion of the activities constituting that offence took place in Canada. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
Surveillance The Siasat Daily has covered the issue of phone hacking and how uses can build an awareness of surveillance. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
Counsel for SSE were Jonathan Peacock KC and Michael Ripley. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
However there was no mention of either in the Queen’s Speech. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
