Search for: "US v. Robert Parker"
Results 61 - 80
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
Justice Kagan questions Robert A. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm
” Liles Parker PLLC [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:18 am
Nebraska v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
US Dept Agri Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 07a0207n.06 2007/03/21 Lichtefeld v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
State Auditors expressed their concerns that some hospice agencies may be using the stolen identities of medical personnel. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:27 am
V. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
If a provider has determined that a subluxation is present based on an x-ray,[v] a Medicare contractor will likely take into consideration when the x-ray was taken and how much time has elapsed before a course of treatment was initiated. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
So far as I am aware, its first juridical use was in Roberson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Well-known former federal judge Robert Parker of Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth of Tyler, Texas, served as local counsel in the case. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:37 am
” V. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Background of the Medicaid After-Hours Claims Issue: The non-emergency use of hospital emergency room services by Medicaid participants has been a long-standing problem of almost four decades. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
At Crooks and Liars, Parker Higgins focuses on comments made by Chief Justice John Roberts during the oral argument in the cellphone privacy cases, in which the Chief Justice expressed skepticism that many law-abiding people carry more than one cellphone. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
As set out below, physicians and other non-hospital health care providers can often use this approach to determine whether specific services billed to Medicare, Medicaid, and/or private payors should be paid. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
" The 2-1 ruling came Friday in Parker, et al., v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:51 am
Mattis, Dalmazzi v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm
H/t: ER.ICYMI: Robert W. [read post]