Search for: "US v. Self" Results 61 - 80 of 15,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Partners Jennifer Breen, Richard Zarin, Daniel Carmody, Stephen Tirrell, and Jedd Wider, with associate Scott Lee, co-authored an article for Law360 looking at the US Tax Court’s recent decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:25 am by Ron Voyles & Associates
              Last week the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas gave us some insight into the current state of guns laws in Texas and the availability of a self-defense claim handing out a decision entitled State of Texas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by John Rubin
In self-defense cases, the defendant typically claims that the “victim” was actually the assailant and that the defendant needed to use force to defend himself, family, home, or other interests. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Masahiro Kurosaki
Sari and Nasu’s argument is predicated on the fact that Article V of the treaty does not expressly require a request or advance consultation for the exercise of collective self-defense, and that a related 1960 exchange of notes (also available in English) expressly exempts operations conducted under Article V from requirements for “prior consultation” that otherwise apply to major changes in the presence of U.S. troops, equipment, or facilities in… [read post]