Search for: "US v. William Gardner" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 2:37 am by Adam Wagner
Special advocates should not be used in international forced marriage cases – New High Court judgment: In Chief Constable & Anor v YK & Ors, the High Court has ruled that special advocates (lawyers instructed to handle security-sensitive evidence in special private hearings) should almost never be used in proceedings to protect a person from a forced marriage (see Paras 88 to 93). [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 2:26 pm by Stephen Gardner
This issue was squarely addressed in    a recent case applying California law, Williams v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” Ronnie Lee Gardner v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” The Florida Supreme Court, 5-2, in Kirk Douglas Williams v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:47 am by Steve Statsinger
Gardner, No. 08-4793-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am by Michael Scutt
There are of course bloggers like Charon QC, Carl Gardner at Head of Legal, the infamous Geeklawyer and John Bolch of Family Lore fame; all three are practically blogging royalty and John is also a member of this forum. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
Gardner, drawing on several US Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Boston, MA; William Crawford, President) Beautiful Carpet Corp. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:10 pm
County of Sonoma (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 543, a case in which the First Appellate District concluded, relying on Gardner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:12 pm
  Rutgers-Camden has a great state con law center, and scholars such as Alan Tarr (Rutgers), Robert Williams (Rugers), Jim Gardner (Buffalo), and Jim Rossi (FSU) do tremendously important work on such issues. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Gardner & Guidone, Inc., we held that a defendant is entitled to attorney fees for defending an injunction if he prevails at a later hearing or otherwise ultimately wins the case. 164 Ind. [read post]